|
|
What's happening to America ?
The Good Muslim
Here is the theory of the "good" Muslim. There are good Muslims and extremist Muslims. You can't judge Islam by a few extremists or even a lot of terrorists.
There are 1.3 billion Muslims. If you are going to measure Islam by individuals you will have to meet and talk with a lot of them, not just the handful you may know. That is the beauty talking about the doctrine. The doctrine stays the same everywhere and is constant over time. Every Muslim can interpret the doctrine as they see fit, so Muslims differ. But in the end, every Muslim is driven by the doctrine.
But let's talk about Ahmed, the good Muslim at work. Ahmed is a professional engineer. He says that terrorists are not real Muslims. His wife does not wear a burka.
It is the whole of Islam that we must measure. Even in Mohammed's day of full jihad, only some of the Muslims were out killing, stealing, raping, assassinating, slaving, kidnapping, and terrorizing. Others were back at home, doing whatever one does at home.
It has never been that every Muslim was a jihadist. But at any time that is always an option. Jihad is always an option for every Muslim.
So yes, Ahmed, the professional engineer at work, is a nice man. Where he differs from the nice Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, or atheist, however, is that Ahmed has another ethical option open at all times.
Remember that a good Muslim is commanded 14 times in the Koran to remember that a Muslim is not actually a friend to the kafirs. To the extent that Ahmed is your friend, he is not a Muslim. To the extent that Ahmed is a Muslim, he is not your friend. After all, you are kafir.
Koran 3:28 - Believers should not take kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah's protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.
Mohammed is the perfect model for a Muslim. Mohammed's uncle adopted him, raised him, taught him the trade of being a businessman, and protected him from harm. But his uncle never converted and Mohammed cursed him to Hell when he would not convert on his deathbed. Mohammed would be friendly to try to convert or get a favor, but he never, ever favored a kafir over a Muslim. He was never an actual friend to a kafir.
At any time that it is needed to advance Islam, Ahmed may be deceitful. He will also give money to Islamic charities that fund jihad. In political matters he will always come down on the side of Islam. And he will say that a terrorist is not a real Muslim. But according to the doctrine of political Islam both the terrorist and Ahmed are real Muslims.
“Judging Islam by any Muslim's actions is plagued by the question of how 'Islamic' any Muslim is. There is only one solid simple ground to discuss Islam, i.e. its political doctrine as found in the Trilogy (Qur'an, Sira, & Hadith). It has many tactical advantages.
Its facts can't be challenged or denied. Any arguments based upon doctrine can't be trumped. You can speak with absolute confidence. By definition, the doctrine is the real Islam.” (Bill Warner)
Pacifism
The elites have a solution for Islam. War is evil and causes suffering. If you treat people well, they will treat you well. This is a logical fallacy that if we treat others well they will treat us well. That is true, if and only if, they follow the Golden Rule.
So if the Golden Rule inspires you to be non-violent, and if the person you are dealing with also practices the Golden Rule, all is fine. But if the other person doesn't follow the Golden Rule, then they can take advantage of you.
Let's take three brief historical examples. The Buddhists of ancient Afghanistan were the descendents of Alexander the Great's warriors. The warriors had been converted to pacifism by Buddhism. Along came Islam and killed every single pacifist who would not convert to Islam. The result is that Buddhism was annihilated in Central Asia.
Martin Luther King applied Gandhi's non-violence to civil rights and it worked. Why? American culture was infused with the Golden Rule and we changed. If Martin Luther King had tried non-violence in Mecca to protest Arabia's religious apartheid, he would have been imprisoned or driven out. Islam does not follow the Golden Rule.
Gandhi used non-violence to shame the British over their rule of India and it worked since the British honored the Golden Rule. But when India practices tolerance with Muslims in India, they get taken advantage of every time.
Pacifists are idealists, not pragmatists, so they claim that any historical failure of pacifism is due to the fact that they just were not pacifistic enough.
All pacifists are social parasites. Every pacifist lives in a nation that was created by blood, since every nation's borders were a result of a violent struggle. Every pious pacifist depends upon someone else to do the dirty work of violence to protect them.
Pacifism can be seen as the societal version of AIDS. AIDS destroys the body's ability to defend itself against infections. Pacifism destroys a society's ability to defend itself against aggression.
Politics is a matter of perception. What pacifists don't know is that Islam sees them as not as a kind and reasonable people, but as dhimmis. Dhimmis are indistinguishable from pacifists. They both submit to Islam on whatever issue is at hand.
An Ethical Basis for War
Let's define the situation:
- Islam has a dualistic ethical system that denies the nature of the Golden Rule. It posits that all people are not equal.
- Islam is a dualistic political system that divides all the world into believers and non-believers.
- Islam has an eternal, universal mandate to annihilate all political systems based upon the ethics of unity.
- Intimidation, demands, and violence may be used against the kafirs.
- 270,000,000 kafirs have been killed by political Islam.
- Over half of Buddhism, Christianity and Hinduism have been annihilated by political Islam.
- Islam cannot be reformed.
- Compromise is only a step towards dhimmitude.
There is no compromise that is logically possible between dualistic ethics and ethics of unity. There is no halfway point between honesty and deceit, freedom and slavery, equality and dhimmitude.
So the choice is between submission and annihilation or war and freedom. The third choice is dhimmitude, or a slow death, since every dhimmi population becomes Islamic over time.
We propose that to preserve our ethical civilization we must defeat political Islam.
The question is: how shall we conduct this war?
The Status of the Far Enemy
At this time, not one element of this strategy has been implemented at any real political level. However, political Islam has every single element of their strategy in place at the global, national, state, and local level.
The Advantages of the Islamic Political Doctrine
There are only three ways to discuss Islam. Religion, culture, and politics. You never make points by discussing religion. Their culture is their business. And the political aspect is all that harms us.
There are four ways to discuss Islamic politics: history, current practice, some Muslim's personal behavior, or doctrine.
Islamic history is almost unknown and has been suppressed by our own fears. This has been covered in the section on Molested Children of Islam.
Current practice is what we see in the newspapers and on TV. This source is largely biased by the media elites never reporting the big picture about Islam.
The Acceptance of Ignorance
We know more about Mars than we do political Islam. Mohammedans have been killing, enslaving and raping for 1400 years and we ignore it. Why don’t we even know we are ignorant ? Denial. Profound denial.
We accept violence and fear from Islam. Any author who writes a book critical about Islam can share Salman Rushdie’s fate-a death sentence by Islamic clerics. Here is the sick part: we don’t protest. We show no outrage. How can we have come to this ? Have we no sense of decency left ? No honor ? No shame ? No common sense ? Kafirs, accept violence and fear from Islam without protest. This acceptance of violence is the sign of a profoundly molested psyche. Kafirs are the battered wife and molested child of Islam.
Violent molestation can cause complete denial.
-------------------------------------------------
More Reading:
Muslim true/false:
What you think you know about them is likely
wrong -- and that's dangerous.
Apr-2-08 09:00 am
By John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed
Politicalislam.com -
"Kafir"
-------------------------------------------------
|
|